DebtDoc Bankruptcy News Blog

Wednesday, 22 July 2015 00:00

The Brunner Test and "Undue Hardship"

Many work tirelessly over the years, but never quite make enough to pay back the large amounts they barrow for their education, and many owe even more when their loan amounts grow even higher when they go to in default.

Many file for bankruptcy, wiping out other debts. But getting rid of student loans requires initiating an entirely separate legal process, where debtors must prove that paying the debt would cause an “undue hardship.”

A case captured the attention of judges and legal scholars when a judge’s bluntly written opinion rebuked the widely adopted hardship standard used to determine whether a debtor is worthy of a discharge.

The judge, Jim D. Pappas, in his written opinion for the bankruptcy appellate panel decision in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, said the analysis used “to determine the existence of an undue hardship is too narrow, no longer reflects reality and should be revised.”

He added: “It would seem that in this new, different environment, in determining whether repayment of a student loan constitutes an undue hardship, a bankruptcy court should be afforded flexibility to consider all relevant facts about the debtor and the subject loans.” But the current standard, he wrote, “does not allow it.”

Although plenty of cases still resemble a strict interpretation of this standard, some judges and courts have let it be known in recent years that they believe the strict standard — known as the Brunner test — should be questioned, even if they are still legally bound to it now.

Because the bankruptcy code never defined “undue hardship,” the courts began developing their own definitions. Many courts adopted the Brunner test, which began from a ruling in 1987, when a woman named Marie Brunner filed for a discharge of her student loan no less than a year after she completed a master’s degree.

In an effort to stop barrowers from trying to cancel their debts prematurely, the case laid out a three-tiered test: Individuals must prove they made a good-faith effort to pay the loan by finding work and minimizing their expenses. Barrowers must show they cannot maintain a standard of living based on their income and expenses if they had to repay the loan.

But then, what is probably the most challening question, the court must consider whether that situation is likely to remain for a substantial part of the repayment process — which in effect, requires the judge to determine the debtor’s future, ensuring what some courts have described as a “certainty of hopelessness.”

Bankruptcy scholars and judges say the Brunner test made sense during the period it was conceived because even if barrowers could not pass the Brunner test, their loans, would automatically be discharged in bankruptcy 5 years after their repayment period started.

In 2015, the legal landscape has drastically changed. Before 1977, student loans were discharged in bankruptcy just like other loans and credit card debts. Congress cracked down on the law in 1976, adding the five-year period, and once again in 1990, when a waiting period was extended to 7 years.

However in 1998, this waiting period was. So now, all barrowers must prove undue hardship to discharge student loan debts. (In 2005, Congress added private student loans as well to a mix of federal education debts that may not be discharged, even though these loans are not backed by the federal government.)

Another case case that gained national attention, involved a “destitute” paralegal by the name of Susan Krieger. According to court documents. Ms. Krieger earned a bachelor’s degree in legal studies. But after looking for a decade, she couldn’t find a job.

The Educational Credit Management Corporation, the agency brought on to battle those trying to escape from the burden of loan repayment in court, argued that Ms. Krieger should enroll in an repayment program. Ms. Krieger’s remaining balance of about $25,000 was discharged eventually.

However, it was the written opinion a reputable judge questioning the application of the Brunner test, that has been routinely cited by other judges. In the ruling, Frank H. Easterbrook, then chief judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, signaled that requiring barrowers to prove their remaining future was “hopeless” and was taking the undue hardship standard too far.

He wrote that it was important not to allow “judicial glosses,” like the language in the Brunner case, “to supersede the statute itself.”

Rafael I. Pardo, a bankruptcy law professor stated that Judge Easterbrook’s opinion was a reminder to other courts that carried a lot of weight. “If this highly respected, highly cerebral conservative judge is saying this, that is a big deal,” he added. “It is a clarion call that some judges should be more forgiving when applying the law.”

Judge Easterbrook and Judge Pappas were not the first judges to harshly criticize the Brunner test standard. Judge James B. Haines Jr., who served 25 years as federal bankruptcy judge wrote in an opinion in 2000, that some courts reach too far in trying to define undue hardship.

He stated that he never felt constrained by the Brunner test because the higher court in his jurisdiction never used that standard, giving him the freedom to consider another standard, whereas judges can consider the “totality of the circumstances.”

“Throughout my time on the bench, I heard many student loan cases,” said Judge Haines, now a professor at Maine University School of Law. “The totality of the circumstances test gave me sufficient structure, with a fair ability to balance all pertinent facts.”

A lot of the facts going into the hardships of those escaping student debt have become more dire over the past 10 years. Among debtors filing for bankruptcy with student loans, the average amount of student loan debt has doubled to just about $31,000 in 2014 from $15,350 in 2005. But even more importantly, student loans as a percentage of the tax filer’s annual gross income have also increased dramatically. In 2014, 16 percent of all bankruptcy filers had student loans that totaled more than 50 percent of their annual income, compared with 5.4 percent in 2005.

This year, President Obama instructed several governmental agencies to review, by Oct. 1, whether the treatment of student loans in bankruptcy should be altered. Congress could tweak the bankruptcy code, perhaps reinstating a waiting period before debts can be canceled. Judge Kaplan, in New Jersey, said perhaps 10 or 15 years was the right number. Otherwise, the existing hardship standard could be overridden if a circuit court hears a case en banc, meaning all of the judges in a circuit decide together.

All of those are long shots, at least for the time being. A larger part of the problem is that only a small percentage of borrowers attempt to discharge their student loans in bankruptcy, perhaps because of the perception that it isn’t feasible.

But debtors’ best chance at having their student loans wiped away may simply be to try.

student loan resolution | student loan debt | bankruptcy attorney san diego

Read 8417 times Last modified on Thursday, 07 November 2019 22:20
Chris Bush

With over 12 years of experience and thousands of cases as a consumer bankruptcy attorney, Chris Bush is on the cutting edge of Bankruptcy and Student Loan Law. Chris can assist you in untangling the options to find the best solution for your specific debt relief case.

Initial Free Consultation

Free Case Evaluations
  1. Your Name(*)
    Please let us know your name.
  2. Your Email(*)
    Please let us know your email address.
  3. Phone(*)
    Please write a subject for your message.
  4. Zip(*)
    Invalid Input
  5. Message(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  6. Invalid Input
  7. Enter Code
    Invalid Input

Auto Loan Delinquency Rising

Late Car Payments?

The number of people 90 days late in car payments approaching peak levels since the subprime crisis of 2010.

If you’re late on your car payments, come in for a Chapter 13 consultation!

Compassionate. No-nonsense. Great job. Saved me $85K!

I had three choices: two large groups, or DebtDoc. I chose DebtDoc because of their numerous excellent reviews from clients as well as other attorneys. Also, I wanted someone to provide personal service and have a vested interest in my difficult student loan case.

I certainly made the right choice. DebtDoc's attorneys personally answered two of my phone calls and regularly answered my emails, even on one Sunday evening.

After 30 years of student loan "prison", he got me freedom AND he even got the US Dept. of Justice to dismiss 25% of my loans, which saved me $85K.

I feel like I have a new lease on life because of DebtDoc. I wish I could recommend 10 stars.

Client Testimonial

To whom it may concern,
DebtDoc's attorneys are extremely knowledgeable with the complexities of Federal Student Loans.
I went from a thriving career to full medical disability, ending with an SSDI placement. Unfortunately, I lost everything and became unable to continue making the student loan payments, so it was in deferment for over five years. When the SSDI settled I tried to negotiate an affordable payment plan with the loan holders but they refused my efforts, instead demanding over twice the amount I could afford.
I contacted DebtDoc and found them to be courteous, responsive and quick to assess my situation. They were sure they could help and took time to answer all questions, which relieved much anxiety. Within months they successfully resolved the debt! With much confidence, I highly recommend DebtDoc.

Clients with Student Loan Debt

Clients with Student Loans

Some information I need to evaluate your Student Loan options is contained in your National Student Loan Data System Report. Instructions for obtaining this report are available on my web site at Simply print/save the reports as a PDF, of all pages. Please DO NOT "DOWNLOAD" THE REPORT from the link - this creates a text file that is very difficult to read; please print the web page as a PDF file - the summary page of all loans AND the individual reports for each loan. Samples of these pages can be viewed by clicking the respective links in the previous sentence. I look forward to reviewing this report with you and assisting you with the management of your Student Loan debt.

I have prepared a brief questionnaire for you to fill out to provide me most of the information I will need. Please click this questionnaire link and provide me with the information listed. I would also like to see copies of your most recent pay stubs or other income information.

My office is located at 2727 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 135, San Diego, CA 92108. The main entrance to the building is on the right/west side. I am on the first floor; when you enter the building, turn right and I’m in the suite at the second door on the left. If the suite door is locked, please call or text at 619-678-1134 and I will let you in. (Unfortunately, I usually can’t hear a knock at that door.) I look forward to meeting with you and assisting you on your path back to financial freedom.